Dinosaur in the Age of Mammals
By Wolfgang Bruno
Tariq Ramadan, the famed "moderate” Muslim who has made deception of non-Muslims into an art form, says the 21st century will see a second role reversal between Islam and the West: The West will begin its new decline, and the Arab-Islamic world its renewal and ascent to centuries of world domination. Princeton historian Bernard Lewis told Die Welt that Europe would be Islamic by the end of this century "at the very latest". Robert Spengler of the Asia Times agrees. What if they are all wrong? What if we state that Europe won’t be Islamic at the end of the 21st century because Islam itself won’t be a force of any significance a century from now?
There are few people of any stature who dare venture such a bold assertion. Ali Sina, the Iranian ex-Muslim and founder of faithfreedom.org, is one of the few who do. Sina has consistently claimed that Islam is “a house of cards that will collapse if sufficiently pushed”, and that we may see the end of Islam within the next few decades. He has compared Islam both to Communism and Nazism, claiming that it will either collapse as the former or be crushed as the latter. These analogies are imperfect, and have rightly been criticized by some. Communism was a recent invention, and a European, materialist ideology not concerned with the hereafter. Islam carries 1400 years of history with it, and is deeply tied to the cultural identity of hundreds of millions of people in a way Communism or Nazism never were. However, Ali Sina may be on to something. I have earlier predicted that what we are witnessing now is an era no less crucial to Islam than the Protestant Reformation was to Christianity. The difference is that Islam may not be flexible enough to handle the challenge, and will disintegrate as a result. For instance, the entire foundation of Islam is based upon female subjugation and male dominance. The movement to grant equality to females will essentially destroy Islam. Islam is quite simply too rigid to survive in a modern world.
It is true that the West at the onset of the 21st century shows signs of weakness and lack of direction. However, it is likely that the USA in particular will retain its leading position for a very long time. Europe does have deeper lying problems, and considering its many Muslim immigrants may indeed face a turbulent and violent period. But even Europe is far from incapable of renewal in the longer run. Perhaps this Islamic threat is precisely the slap in the face we need to regenerate and regain our sense of purpose. It is also true that our status as the leading civilization is not given by nature. We will be challenged during this century, but not by Islam. Our contenders are not Muslims, but Asian non-Muslims, who display a dynamism far beyond anything the Ummah can produce. The total nonfossil fuel exports from the entire Arab world amount to less than the total exports of Finland, a tiny infidel country of only 5 million inhabitants. A United Nations report warns that a majority of Arab young people want to leave their homelands in favor of the West. Is that the hallmark of a culture at the brink of world dominance, Mr. Ramadan?
Besides oil, the only thing Islam has going for it is extremely high birth rates. This can be seen as an advantage as long as Muslims are allowed to dump this excess population in non-Muslim countries and dominate these through demographic jihad. If the non-Muslims should decide to curb Muslim immigration, even the high birth rates would turn into a curse. Islamic nations are already falling apart. At the time when the oil revenues run out for Muslims states, India and China may have had missions to the moon. The 21st century will not be an Islamic century. Most likely, it will continue with a Western lead. The alternative is some sort of power sharing between Western and Eastern infidels. The Islamic world, stripped of its oil revenues and no longer able to export its population growth to non-Muslims countries, will hardly be a blip on the radar screen.
Ohmyrus, a member of faithfreedom.org, has given a good description of the Islamic predicament in his essay “Once were warriors: Why Islam failed Muslims”. Islam is a warrior’s creed that served its early followers well. It prospered because its ethos makes it very successful as a medieval war machine when men fought with swords, bows and spears. From impoverished desert tribes, they rose to forge an empire in a short time that stretched from Spain to India. The ethos it engendered – brotherhood for believers, contempt and hatred for non-believers, belief in heavenly rewards for fallen warriors, a high fertility rate (which requires the subordination of women), blind obedience – created formidable warriors. But these same qualities are handicaps for Muslims in the age of the microchip. Islam’s ritualistic practices inculcate blind obedience among its followers and not questioning inquisitive minds. The way the Koran is taught in traditional Madrassahs is by memorization. This leaves no room for asking questions. Asking questions risks the student of being accused of blasphemy or unbelief. Great scientists and philosophers do not come from such a passive environment. Islam is specialized and tailor-made for a society that no longer exists, and instinctively wants to drag the rest of the world back to these “glory days”. It used to be excellent for breeding soldiers, to plunder the lands of non-Muslims. But even this gets increasingly difficult, in a world of advanced technology.
Of course, even if Islam is collapsing as we speak, that does not mean that it is nothing to worry about. On the contrary. There are few things more lethal than a wounded beast, trapped in a corner. And that is exactly what Islam is now. Worst case, it could be a very violent collapse, if Islamic radicals manage to ignite a global war. Islam is the Tyrannosaurus Rex of the 21st century. Once king and feared by all, now sidelined by smarter and faster-adapting creatures in a world it no longer understands. The old giant can still be dangerous, lashing out with a vengeance against the new breed. Mammals, they call them, these upstarters. It makes a lot of noise and may even succeed in killing some of the ones unlucky enough to be standing in its way. But terrifying as it may seem, it is destined to fail. This is the age for big brains, not big but slow limbs. It will end its days in museums, scaring kids of the future hearing tales about this big monster which ones roamed the earth. Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaida are but the last roar of a dying beast, a dinosaur in the age of mammals.
Tariq Ramadan, the famed "moderate” Muslim who has made deception of non-Muslims into an art form, says the 21st century will see a second role reversal between Islam and the West: The West will begin its new decline, and the Arab-Islamic world its renewal and ascent to centuries of world domination. Princeton historian Bernard Lewis told Die Welt that Europe would be Islamic by the end of this century "at the very latest". Robert Spengler of the Asia Times agrees. What if they are all wrong? What if we state that Europe won’t be Islamic at the end of the 21st century because Islam itself won’t be a force of any significance a century from now?
There are few people of any stature who dare venture such a bold assertion. Ali Sina, the Iranian ex-Muslim and founder of faithfreedom.org, is one of the few who do. Sina has consistently claimed that Islam is “a house of cards that will collapse if sufficiently pushed”, and that we may see the end of Islam within the next few decades. He has compared Islam both to Communism and Nazism, claiming that it will either collapse as the former or be crushed as the latter. These analogies are imperfect, and have rightly been criticized by some. Communism was a recent invention, and a European, materialist ideology not concerned with the hereafter. Islam carries 1400 years of history with it, and is deeply tied to the cultural identity of hundreds of millions of people in a way Communism or Nazism never were. However, Ali Sina may be on to something. I have earlier predicted that what we are witnessing now is an era no less crucial to Islam than the Protestant Reformation was to Christianity. The difference is that Islam may not be flexible enough to handle the challenge, and will disintegrate as a result. For instance, the entire foundation of Islam is based upon female subjugation and male dominance. The movement to grant equality to females will essentially destroy Islam. Islam is quite simply too rigid to survive in a modern world.
It is true that the West at the onset of the 21st century shows signs of weakness and lack of direction. However, it is likely that the USA in particular will retain its leading position for a very long time. Europe does have deeper lying problems, and considering its many Muslim immigrants may indeed face a turbulent and violent period. But even Europe is far from incapable of renewal in the longer run. Perhaps this Islamic threat is precisely the slap in the face we need to regenerate and regain our sense of purpose. It is also true that our status as the leading civilization is not given by nature. We will be challenged during this century, but not by Islam. Our contenders are not Muslims, but Asian non-Muslims, who display a dynamism far beyond anything the Ummah can produce. The total nonfossil fuel exports from the entire Arab world amount to less than the total exports of Finland, a tiny infidel country of only 5 million inhabitants. A United Nations report warns that a majority of Arab young people want to leave their homelands in favor of the West. Is that the hallmark of a culture at the brink of world dominance, Mr. Ramadan?
Besides oil, the only thing Islam has going for it is extremely high birth rates. This can be seen as an advantage as long as Muslims are allowed to dump this excess population in non-Muslim countries and dominate these through demographic jihad. If the non-Muslims should decide to curb Muslim immigration, even the high birth rates would turn into a curse. Islamic nations are already falling apart. At the time when the oil revenues run out for Muslims states, India and China may have had missions to the moon. The 21st century will not be an Islamic century. Most likely, it will continue with a Western lead. The alternative is some sort of power sharing between Western and Eastern infidels. The Islamic world, stripped of its oil revenues and no longer able to export its population growth to non-Muslims countries, will hardly be a blip on the radar screen.
Ohmyrus, a member of faithfreedom.org, has given a good description of the Islamic predicament in his essay “Once were warriors: Why Islam failed Muslims”. Islam is a warrior’s creed that served its early followers well. It prospered because its ethos makes it very successful as a medieval war machine when men fought with swords, bows and spears. From impoverished desert tribes, they rose to forge an empire in a short time that stretched from Spain to India. The ethos it engendered – brotherhood for believers, contempt and hatred for non-believers, belief in heavenly rewards for fallen warriors, a high fertility rate (which requires the subordination of women), blind obedience – created formidable warriors. But these same qualities are handicaps for Muslims in the age of the microchip. Islam’s ritualistic practices inculcate blind obedience among its followers and not questioning inquisitive minds. The way the Koran is taught in traditional Madrassahs is by memorization. This leaves no room for asking questions. Asking questions risks the student of being accused of blasphemy or unbelief. Great scientists and philosophers do not come from such a passive environment. Islam is specialized and tailor-made for a society that no longer exists, and instinctively wants to drag the rest of the world back to these “glory days”. It used to be excellent for breeding soldiers, to plunder the lands of non-Muslims. But even this gets increasingly difficult, in a world of advanced technology.
Of course, even if Islam is collapsing as we speak, that does not mean that it is nothing to worry about. On the contrary. There are few things more lethal than a wounded beast, trapped in a corner. And that is exactly what Islam is now. Worst case, it could be a very violent collapse, if Islamic radicals manage to ignite a global war. Islam is the Tyrannosaurus Rex of the 21st century. Once king and feared by all, now sidelined by smarter and faster-adapting creatures in a world it no longer understands. The old giant can still be dangerous, lashing out with a vengeance against the new breed. Mammals, they call them, these upstarters. It makes a lot of noise and may even succeed in killing some of the ones unlucky enough to be standing in its way. But terrifying as it may seem, it is destined to fail. This is the age for big brains, not big but slow limbs. It will end its days in museums, scaring kids of the future hearing tales about this big monster which ones roamed the earth. Osama bin Laden and Al-Qaida are but the last roar of a dying beast, a dinosaur in the age of mammals.

7 Comments:
Bruno Writes: ...the entire foundation of Islam is based upon female subjugation and male dominance. The movement to grant equality to females will essentially destroy Islam. Islam is quite simply too rigid to survive in a modern world.
First, what does it mean to say Islam won't "survive"? What does survive mean? Historically, no culture/civilization/religion has survived in the face of Islam except the Hindus (by sheer luck. British came and defeated the Muslims). Even this was a military victory only. Culturally nothing has even made a dent in the barbarity of Islam. To this day Muslims do what they were doing 1400 years ago.
The rights of women won't weaken Islam because women are not willing to die for their rights. Put simply, you will only get what someone gives to you or what you get for yourself by force. This is the reality of the world. Muslims aren't going to give any rights to women and women will never have the force to wrest their rights from men. The problem is that in this age of PC, it is illegal to say women differ from men. This is the most absurd thing on this planet and may ultimately do us all in. Muslims say it openly and have a role for the women and a lot of women seem to like it. They all want some tweaks here and there but by and large they seem to be ok with their situation.
Even if the womens right were to damage Islam, it will take a long time and by that time Muslims would have multiplied to a point where to win or lose would be meaningless because the minority (us) woudl have lost critical mass. Take the case of Hindus in Bangladesh and Pakistan they are virtually extinct from their former numbers and these two countries are a little mellow due to their contact with hinduism which is actively being reversed by Saudi funded madrassas.
Fundamentally, the non-muslims give religions a wide leash but Islam is not a religion. If the KKK were to declare themselves to be a religion tomorrow, they will enjoy the same privileges of Islam. Our value system of allowing anything that calls itself a religion to flourish is flawed and we may not be able to correct it time.
To quote Will Durant in The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage, page 459: "The Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown by barbarians invading from without and multiplying from within."
The keyword is "Multiplying from within"
You can't prevent this because you won't call Islam an enemy and ban its practice. This means that they will come to your country multiply and multiply fast. Out of this population, 10-15% will actually follow the teachings of Islam and bring about the demise of the non-believers. End of story.
It is just a matter of time. In fact we must start a website called deathwatch and plot the important events in the demise of Europe. It will be interesting...atleast until America is taken at which point the servers will be shutdown.
Gopragrr wrote "This is the most absurd thing on this planet and may ultimately do us all in. Muslims say it openly and have a role for the women and a lot of women seem to like it"
I dont agree with you. Although I see young Marroccan teenage girls running around in all kinds of newly fashioned head scarves. I still believe many of these women do not really like being subjugated. I am not sure, trying to see a less grim picture , and erase Eurabia from my mind :) But I know a couple of educated men from Iraq, who totally refuse Islam and Mohammed. Both are meds and probably they dont advertise their anti-islamic ideas. I think that truth will kill this dinosaur. Just the way Wolfgang described it. Islam is grotesque , out-rated as an ideology and you need to be some kind of a psychopath to apply it literally. An example , one of these medics I mentioned, told me once he would never go back to his homeland because he would never allow any savage to treat his daughter the way moslims treat their women. Islam seems violent because of these Arabs satellite channels who are constantly pounding on young second generation moslims here telling them what to think .
I do somehow agree with your grim picture of what would happens next. But I see one bright spot of hope, and that is Iran . Persian nationalism will defeat Islam . Persians are not Arabs and they have a old culture of humanism thats totally incompatible with Islam. Maybe Iranians will see what Islam is doing to their neighbouring Iraqi nation, that is disintegrating into a blood bath. I am sure many people , even if a modest percentage can make the link. Lets hope Europeans can make the link as well.
Take care
The advantage that Muslims have over us in the West is that they have no qualms over using violence. Here in the West there are too many people who think it is illegitimate for the West to use violence. After Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait, I had a bitter argument with some friends, not over this barbaric act, but over our likely response to it, which they condemned. While people like that do not have much political power here in America, they have enormous amounts of cultural power. They run our media and our schools. They remind me of a white woman I heard about who, in the late 1960s before feminists became angry about rape, allowed a black man to rape her because she was so consumed with guilt about racism. This is the left's response to Islam. What it means in the long run, I don't know, but I do know it doesn't bode well for the short run or the medium run.
Well, according to me, we have to now let go of our timid and illogical anthropological philosophy of allowing ISLAM and followers of ISLAM to go on with all they are going with. We need to be one, tell this ideas to the stupid people who are ruling us. And I am cent percent sure that they would not not take this knowledge into their dick heads and due to the petty politics.
I have been through a lot of discussions like this. Infact I had a literal fight with one of my friends on this issue when I told them and revealed the barbarism of ISLAM. And I don't think it is their fault. From their birth they have been taught that ISLAM is a peaceful and very good religion. And most of us don't have the courage to pursue further study and find out the truth.
Hence the TRUTH must be enforced on everybody. Then the TRUTH will prevail. I hope we are successful in this mission. Internet definitely is a very good medium. But we need other mediums such as TV, Newspapers, etc. which covers a more differential and wide area.
Lets pray to God that we are able to force the TRUTH on everybody.
Thank you Wolfgang for not surrendering to apocalyptic defeatism - which tends to put me off getting out of bed in the morning.
I want to see lots of public debate about the contents of the Koran and the life of Muhammad. The more I've read about Muhammad, the closer he seems to Genghis Khan than to Gandhi. I suspect orthodox Islam cannot survive a skeptical, questioning attitude to its sacred text and most revered historical figure.
"Wimmins Lib" is a big part of the answer. Mary Wollstonecraft may yet defeat the mullahs. Once there are large numbers of "Reformed Mosques" with female Imams, on the model of "Reformed Synagogues" with Female Rabbis, Islam will have mutated into something essentially harmless to the rest of us. How we get there is not so easy. But here are some suggestions:
1. In the UK we don't allow a Jehovah's Witness parent to refuse a blood transfusion to his child. The child must reach adulthood. As an adult she may then decide for herself to refuse a transfusion. I think this should be the model for our attitude to hijabs, jilbabs, burqas and the rest. Forbid their wearing by children. Children who are deemed too immature to vote are surely too immature to make an informed decision about Islamic dress. Once they're old enough to vote, they can wear what they like.
2. We need to get tough on coercive first-cousin marriages. We also need to get tough on honour killings, and stop viewing them as part of the rich fabric of multicultural life. This is tricky to deal with, requiring greatly improved police work. Unfortunately, even after they are caught and sentenced, such killers are usually still proud of their crimes. The only thing which apparently dents this pride is the fear that they will be sodomized by other prisoners, and that their community will find out about it. I don't see how a civilized justice system could institute the only currently-known deterrent. So efficient detection of the culprits is the only way.
altogether too much gnashing of teeth and pulling of hair is going on at this website. Take a break. walk outside. Its a big world. No monolithic fascist mind-control ideology is going to take over and run the whole place. Which doesnt mean they wont try. But it does mean that the big picture is not that easily transformed. its not a pleasant picture, but its not going to be all one color now or ever.
Anything that is negative would perish under its own weight. Most of what Koran teaches is negative.
Ten commandments – Islam (Population 1500 million):
1. Kill kafirs(Non Muslims) - you will not be punished for that.
2. Fight kafirs until all religions surrender to Islam.
3. Cut off hands and legs of kafirs
4. Arouse Muslims to loot and kill kafirs
5. Don’t befriend a kafir
6. Strive hard to stop progress of kafirs
7. Flog your wife – A Muslim is free to rape
8. Muslims are the best – Do jihad to serve Allah.
9. Kill the Muslim who converts from Islam.
10. Love Arabs-Allah is Arab and speaks Arabic
http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dd3b6rr5_0w9q8ckdp
Post a Comment
<< Home